Novel methods identify and quantify N6-methyladenosine motifs in RNA transcripts, suggesting potential for early cancer diagnosis.
Background N6-methyladenosine profiles of mRNA transcripts regulate their translocation from the nucleus to the cytosol, stability, and translational efficiency; hence, they have been implicated in gene expression and disease progression. The m 6 A-methylation is widely associated with various cancers and neurological, cardiovascular, and developmental disorders, which demand early diagnosis. A robust m 6 A-motif prediction is necessary to enable us to identify the regulatory nucleic acid sequences that determine mRNA fate in normal and diseased conditions. Methods and Results We have developed a transcript-aware computational pipeline, termed m 6 A Functional Index in Transcription (m 6 A-FINDiT), that can identify potential m 6 A sites on mRNA transcripts, considering molecular intricacies associated with their secondary structure. This tool can separately identify m 6 A motifs within the coding sequences as well as in non-translatable regions, i.e., 5’UTR and 3’UTR, of mRNA transcripts. Parallelly, another technique was developed that quantifies specific m 6 A methylation motifs through a probe-based ELISA process, MAQ-G. This second method successfully validated the N⁶-methyladenosine motifs predicted by the initially developed motif-finder program. Conclusion This integrated m 6 A-FINDiT and MAQ-G, coupled with a real-time qPCR assay, could correlate the methylation profiles of N6-methyladenosine motifs with the expression and stability contours of a gene. To establish the physiological implications of these techniques, we chose three tumour-suppressor genes, viz., IRF8 , RB1 , and TP53 mRNA transcripts, which may undergo m 6 A methylation at certain DRACH motifs. The m 6 A-FINDiT pipeline could successfully predict the specific m 6 A motifs, and the MAQ-G confirmed the methylation profile of the latter. These duo techniques hold potential for use in clinical settings for early cancer detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choudhari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: