PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 10, 2026Acta Orthopaedica0 citationsOpen Access

Association between superficial surgical site infection and revision after primary total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 3,242 patients

View Full Paper
CPC. PollmannTOThomas OmJRJan Harald Røtterud

Key Points

  • The study investigates whether superficial surgical site infections after total hip arthroplasty lead to a higher risk of revision surgery.
  • Single-center, observational cohort study using data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and local infection surveillance program.
  • Included 3,242 patients from January 1999 to December 2019 who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty.
  • Utilized frequentist Cox regression and Bayesian survival analysis to compare revision surgery risks between patients with and without superficial SSI.
  • 27 patients experienced a superficial surgical site infection during the follow-up period.
  • Cox regression analysis indicated an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.4 (95% CI: 0.3-5.9, P = 0.6) for revision surgery in the SSI group compared to no SSI group.
  • Bayesian survival analysis showed a very low (1%) probability of increased revision risk associated with superficial SSIs.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate whether a superficial surgical site infection (SSI) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with an increased risk of subsequent revision hip arthroplasty for any cause. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational study based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) and the local infection surveillance program. All patients operated on with a primary THA at our institution from January 1999 through December 2019 were eligible for the study. The risk of revision surgery for any cause was compared between the exposed (superficial SSI) and the unexposed group (no SSI) with frequentist (Cox regression) and Bayesian survival analysis. RESULTS: 3,242 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up in the NAR was 7, minimum follow-up was 4 years. 27 patients were registered with a superficial SSI. A Cox regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) class, duration of surgery, and year of surgery gave an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.4 (95% confidence interval: 0.3-5.9, P = 0.6) for the risk of revision for any cause in the exposed group (superficial SSI) compared with the unexposed group (no SSI). A Bayesian survival model, adjusted for the same covariates, gave a censored time coefficient of 0.5 (95% credible interval: 0.1-0.9), with a corresponding very low (1%) probability of an increased risk of revision for any cause in the exposed group. CONCLUSION: We showed no association between superficial SSI and revision after primary THA. Thus, our data does not support the dogma that superficial SSIs after primary THA do not exist.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pollmann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a508df96eeac72a437a12eehttps://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46223
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper