Demonstrates enhanced air permeability in hydrogels for biomedical use, indicating improved gas exchange capabilities.
Hydrogels are widely used in biomedical interfaces, in which effective gas exchange (for example, O2, CO2) within a water-rich environment is essential. However, hydrogels show intrinsically limited air exchange efficiency, owing to the low solubility (C) and diffusivity (D) of non-polar gases in the polar water medium1. This limitation poses a substantial bottleneck in long-term applications, such as wearable health monitors2–7 and tissue engineering8–12. Existing methods13–16 to enhance air permeability suffer from poor robustness and/or an inherent trade-off between permeability and water content (for example, <50 vol%). Here we introduce a viscoelastic phase separation17 (VPS)-enabled strategy to create a non-collapsible, air-rich network in high-water-content hydrogels, achieving a record-high oxygen permeability of 185 barrer with 70 vol% water—a tenfold increase compared with pristine hydrogels. VPS, a ubiquitous phenomenon in soft matter, is used to drive hydrophobic, dry gas particles within a hydrophilic, wet medium into a thin, stable three-dimensional network. This approach allows the facile and scalable fabrication of air-permeable hydrogels across diverse chemistries and form factors. Physiological tests over a 10-day continuous wear condition confirmed their effectiveness in preventing fluid accumulation and maintaining skin health. This strategy paves the way for hydrogels in long-term biomedical applications in which efficient and sustained air exchange becomes critical. Viscoelastic phase separation is used to fabricate non-collapsible, air-rich networks in high-water-content hydrogels containing silica aerogel beads, allowing air to permeate through the material and enabling a tenfold increase in oxygen permeability over pristine hydrogels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: