Randomized trial demonstrates altered carbon fluxes in tundra ecosystems, suggesting climate implications.
Earthworms able to process and rework mineral soil layers (‘geoengineering’ earthworms) are currently expanding their range in arctic ecosystems. Recent assessments suggest that geoengineering earthworms alter the terrestrial carbon (C) balance of arctic ecosystems by affecting ecosystem productivity and respiration, effects that could be generated simultaneously or at different times of the growing season. In this study, we test if these earthworms affect the seasonal shift in CO 2 net ecosystem exchange (NEE), gross primary production (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (ER) in the tundra. Over 2 years, we measured the effect of Aporrectodea spp. and Lumbricus spp. on CO 2 exchange processes in two contrasting tundra vegetation types (heath and meadow) in a common garden experiment. We observed expected seasonal differences in GPP and ER with higher, GPP driven, uptake of CO 2 in the peak growing season compared to the end of the season. Earthworm presence did not change ecosystem C fluxes during early and peak season but led to a greater ecosystem uptake of CO 2 (NEE—45%) near the end of the growing season in both vegetation types. This late growing season increase in ecosystem CO 2 uptake correlated positively with greener vegetation with earthworm presence, but was diminished during a summer with severe drought. We, therefore, suggest that the CO 2 flux is driven by a change in plant phenology caused by earthworm activity extending late season photosynthesis, but that the strength of this effect is climate dependent. Our findings illustrate that geoengineering earthworms can impact plant phenology to generating a CO 2 flux that acts to counter the increased respiration losses expected to accompany warming autumns and an extended thawing period in the Arctic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonsson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: