Pooled analysis reveals that NPIs significantly reduced GDP growth in China, highlighting policy trade-offs.
This study examines the economic impacts of non-pharmaceutical interventions implemented in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, utilizing a provincial-level panel dataset from 2020Q1 to 2022Q4. We employ a pooled OLS model with panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) to address cross-sectional dependence, serial correlation, and heteroskedasticity, while a fixed-effects instrumental variable (FE-IV) model is used to resolve endogeneity from reverse causality. The analysis reveals that NPIs significantly reduced quarterly GDP growth, with coefficients ranging from -0.078 to 0.154 across models. Regional heterogeneity shows stronger negative effects in eastern (-0.092) provinces compared to western and central provinces. Temporal analysis further identifies an empirically observed three-stage targeted response: significant negative impacts in 2020 (-0.180), but an insignificant effect in 2021 and 2022, reflecting policy adjustments and economic adaptation. The findings underscore the trade-offs between public health measures and economic performance, with an estimated 0.096 percentage point economic loss due to NPIs, consistent with global studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Q et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: