Working paper evaluates actual crime changes in Peru amid policing surges, suggesting reporting shifts complicate true crime trends.
Working paper (v1 preprint). Peru declared recurrent states of emergency against organized crime in 2024-2026. Because a policing surge changes how crime is recorded, standard evaluations of police complaints conflate a change in true crime with a change in reporting. Using a district-month panel of police complaints (SIDPOL) and a verified inventory of emergency decrees, the effect on recorded extortion is about +15 percent (Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood, clean pre-trends), but the effect on true crime is not point-identified. We develop a partial-identification framework (Manski bounds with a clean lethal-violence anchor calibration, to be composed with honest difference-in-differences) and report the identified set: under the assumption that the emergency did not reduce reporting, the true increase is at most 15 percent and a genuine decline is not ruled out. The paper characterizes what can and cannot be learned given Peru crime data, and releases an open, reproducible, CPU-only pipeline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karl Mollan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: