Randomized trial assesses soil nutrient status in vegetable cultivated soils, indicating significant spatial variability.
Site-specific nutrient management in the vegetable growing belts of lower Himalayan region is a crucial component of sustainable crop production, especially since relatively small landholdings and unpredictable water availability is involved. Such precision approaches require holistic datasets that exhibit an accurate outlay of the existing conditions to allow for augmented soil management protocols and reduced risk from nutrient deficiency and land deterioration patterns. Soil nutrient management strategies can be modelled efficiently with spatial clustering and distribution visualization. Thus, this study was conducted in the cauliflower growing areas of Indora block (Kangra district), Himachal Pradesh, India to study the soil attribute status (physical, electro-chemical, chemical) of the region. Spatial autocorrelation assessment (Global Moran’s I) revealed statistically significant distribution of 6 soil properties (pH, EC, OC, porosity, N, S), with S expressing the highest number of significantly clustered sampling sites (47) via Local Indicator of Spatial Association analysis. Principal component analysis revealed 6 principal components with eigen values > 1, accounting for 69.43% of total variance. Spatial variability maps developed via inverse distance weighted technique depicted spatial variation of the soil properties across the study site as affected by pedogenic processes and localized management practices. The study addresses spatial heterogeneity of soil characteristics, delineates management zones and provides a scientific reference for land resource evaluation studies. Spatial variability of soil properties across vegetable growing region of lower Himalayas. Assessment of soil nutritional status. EC, OC, pH, N, S and porosity expressed structured spatial distribution at the local level. Spatial distribution maps developed for key soil properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atwal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: