Prospective cohort study assesses oncostatin M's prognostic value for in-hospital mortality in pulmonary embolism, suggesting further investigation is needed.
Early risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) guides emergency management. Oncostatin M (OSM), an interleukin-6-family cytokine linked to endothelial activation and inflammation, may provide prognostic information complementary to established tools such as the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). This prospective single-center cohort study enrolled 88 participants: 44 patients with CTPA-confirmed PE, 22 PE-negative patients, and 22 controls. Serum OSM was measured by ELISA at emergency department presentation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Contextual between-group comparisons were performed, and the incremental value of OSM beyond sPESI was assessed using parsimonious logistic regression and ROC analysis with DeLong testing. In-hospital mortality among patients with PE was 47.7% (21/44). OSM levels were higher in patients with PE than in PE-negative patients or controls (median, 277.3 vs. 143.8 and 145.8 pg/mL; p < 0.001). Among PE patients, non-survivors had higher OSM levels than survivors (333.4 [267.9–382.8] vs. 253.7 [225.5–292.3] pg/mL; p = 0.004). After adjustment for sPESI, each 100 pg/mL increase in OSM showed a non-significant association with mortality (adjusted OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 0.95–6.07; p = 0.065). Adding OSM to sPESI numerically increased the AUC from 0.717 to 0.789, but this improvement was not significant (ΔAUC = 0.071; p = 0.161). OSM levels were higher among non-survivors with acute PE; however, OSM did not provide statistically significant incremental discrimination beyond sPESI in this cohort. Larger multicenter studies are needed to clarify its prognostic utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girgin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: