Key result
Modern era linked to ~32% lower 30-day mortality in hospitalized aortic dissection patients.
Why the study?
Large population-based studies of aortic dissection are lacking, leaving incidence figures, time-trends, and sex differences uncertain.
Does the later time period (2012-2016) improve 30-day mortality in adults hospitalized with aortic dissection compared to an earlier period (2002-2006)?
Cohort (n=8,057)
Yes
Does the later time period (2012-2016) improve 30-day mortality in adults hospitalized with aortic dissection compared to an earlier period (2002-2006)?
This nationwide study reveals a higher than previously reported incidence of aortic dissection and demonstrates significant improvements in survival and surgical management over time, though women continue to experience higher postoperative mortality.
Observed 30-day mortality decline in aortic dissection may reflect care advances; leaves open causal factors and persistent sex disparities.
AIMS: As large population-based studies of aortic dissection are lacking, the incidence numbers and knowledge about time-trends and sex differences are uncertain. The objective was to describe incidence, temporal trends and outcome of aortic dissection with particular emphasis on sex differences. METHODS AND RESULTS: During the study period 2002-2016, 8057 patients in Sweden were diagnosed with aortic dissection, identified from the National Patient Register and the Cause of Death Register. A total of 5757 (71%) patients were hospitalized, whereas 2300 (29%) patients were deceased without concurrent hospital stay. The annual incidence was 7.2 per 100 000 (9.1 in men and 5.4 in women), decreasing over time in men (P = 0.005). Mean age in the hospitalized patients was 68 years (SD 13), 2080 (36%) were women. Within the first 14 days after onset, 1807 patients (32%) underwent surgical repair. The proportion of surgically treated increased from the 5-year period 2002-2006 to 2012-2016 [27% vs. 35%, odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-1.86; P < 0.001]. In hospitalized patients, 30-day mortality decreased between the same periods (26% vs. 21%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.80; P < 0.001). Long-term mortality decreased as well (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.82; P < 0.001). Women had higher 30-day mortality than men after acute repair, a sex difference that remained after age adjustment (17% vs. 12%, OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04-1.82; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: This population-based study detected a higher incidence of aortic dissection than prior reports, but a decreasing incidence in men. Surgical therapy was increasingly used and with more favourable outcome but was less frequently offered to elderly patients. The sustained sex differences regarding both incidence and outcome require further attention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smedberg et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Aortic dissection (n=8,057). Later time period (2012-2016) vs. Earlier time period (2002-2006) was evaluated on 30-day mortality in hospitalized patients (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.80, p=<0.001). In hospitalized patients with aortic dissection, 30-day mortality decreased significantly from 26% in 2002-2006 to 21% in 2012-2016 (OR 0.68, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: