Key result
Intracoronary rFGF2 fails to improve exercise tolerance or perfusion over placebo despite reducing angina.
Why the study?
Does a single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 improve exercise tolerance, myocardial perfusion, and symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease?
Population
337 patients with coronary artery disease
Comparison
Single intracoronary infusion of recombinant… vs Placebo
Design
RCT, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Follow-up
180 days
Authors
Loading...
A single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 in patients with coronary artery disease does not improve exercise tolerance or myocardial perfusion, though it may transiently improve angina symptoms.
RCT (n=337)
double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does a single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 improve exercise tolerance, myocardial perfusion, and symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease?
A single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 in patients with coronary artery disease does not improve exercise tolerance or myocardial perfusion, though it may transiently improve angina symptoms.
Simons et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in coronary artery disease (n=337). recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2 (rFGF2) vs. placebo was evaluated on Exercise tolerance, myocardial nuclear perfusion imaging, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36 questionnaire at 90 and 180 days. A single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 did not improve exercise tolerance or myocardial perfusion compared to placebo, though it reduced angina symptoms at 90 days (overall P=0.035).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: