Key result
Water-saturation MRI with computer segmentation provided accurate quantification of visceral adipose tissue, showing good correlation with manual techniques (K = 0.8) and high reproducibility.
Why the study?
Does water-saturation MRI with computer segmentation accurately and efficiently quantify visceral adipose tissue compared to manual techniques?
Population
5 patients undergoing whole-volume coverage of the abdomen MRI
Comparison
T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo… vs T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo breath-hold…
Authors
Loading...
May support automated VAT quantification in small cohorts; leaves open validation in larger studies before clinical adoption.
Does water-saturation MRI with computer segmentation accurately and efficiently quantify visceral adipose tissue compared to manual techniques?
Effect estimate: K = 0.8
Water-saturation MRI combined with computer segmentation provides an accurate, highly reproducible, and time-efficient method for quantifying visceral adipose tissue.
Armao et al. (2006) studied this question. Water-saturation MRI and computer segmentation vs. Non-water-saturation MRI and manual technique was evaluated on Accuracy and reproducibility of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume quantification (K = 0.8). Water-saturation MRI with computer segmentation provided accurate quantification of visceral adipose tissue, showing good correlation with manual techniques (K = 0.8) and high reproducibility.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: