Key result
Increased aortic stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, was cross-sectionally associated with worse left ventricular global longitudinal strain (B 0.122% strain per SD, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Is aortic stiffness associated with worse left ventricular global longitudinal strain in a community-based population free of cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,495)
Is aortic stiffness associated with worse left ventricular global longitudinal strain in a community-based population free of cardiovascular disease?
Increased aortic stiffness is cross-sectionally associated with worse left ventricular global longitudinal strain, suggesting a direct mechanical link between proximal aortic stiffening and early subclinical cardiac dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aortic stiffness associated with worse GLS (esp. women) should not change practice; leaves open causal confirmation and intervention targets.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness impairs optimal ventricular-vascular coupling and left ventricular systolic function, particularly in the long axis. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) has recently emerged as a sensitive measure of early cardiac dysfunction. In this study, we investigated the relation between aortic stiffness and GLS in a large community-based sample. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 2495 participants (age 39-90 years, 57% women) of the Framingham Offspring and Omni cohorts, free of cardiovascular disease, we performed tonometry to measure arterial hemodynamics and echocardiography to assess cardiac function. Aortic stiffness was evaluated as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and as characteristic impedance, and GLS was calculated using speckle tracking-based measurements. In multivariable analyses adjusting for age, sex, height, systolic blood pressure, augmentation index, left ventricular structure, and additional cardiovascular risk factors, increased carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (B±SE: 0.122±0.030% strain per SD, P<0.0001) and characteristic impedance (0.090±0.029, P=0.002) were both associated with worse GLS. We observed effect modification by sex on the relation between characteristic impedance and GLS (P=0.004); in sex-stratified multivariable analyses, the relation between greater characteristic impedance and worse GLS persisted in women (0.145±0.039, P=0.0003) but not in men (P=0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple measures of increased aortic stiffness were cross-sectionally associated with worse GLS after adjusting for hemodynamic variables. Parallel reductions in left ventricular long axis shortening and proximal aortic longitudinal strain in individuals with a stiffened proximal aorta, from direct mechanical ventricular-vascular coupling, offers an alternative explanation for the observed relations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bell et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Free of cardiovascular disease (n=2,495). Aortic stiffness was evaluated on Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) (B 0.122, p=<0.0001). Increased aortic stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, was cross-sectionally associated with worse left ventricular global longitudinal strain (B 0.122% strain per SD, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: