Evaluates acrylonitrile wastewater treatment effectiveness in adsorbent selection, implying cost reductions for industry use.
Acrylonitrile (AN) wastewater, characterized by high toxicity, poor biodegradability, and elevated treatment costs, poses a major challenge to the sustainable development of the chemical industry. To support concentration-dependent adsorbent screening for coal-based granular activated carbons (CGACs), this study established a modular adsorption and techno-economic evaluation framework was established. Two independent time-constrained modules, namely high-concentration loading (COD approximately 500 mg/L) and low-concentration polishing (COD approximately 50 mg/L). ere used to compare the adsorption behavior of micropore and mesopor CGACs. Micropore- CGACs showed higher adsorption capacity in the high-concentration conditions, with CGAC-8 reaching an equilibrium capacity of 89.43 mg/g, whereas mesopore- CGACs exhibited more favorable pore accessibility and mass-transfer behavior during low-concentration polishing. The techno-economic assessment further incorporated working capacity, regeneration loss, energy consumption, and material cost was established for comparative assessment under standardized conditions. Under the defined assumptions, the CGAC-8 front + CGAC-2 polishing configuration was identified as an economically preferred conceptual option. These results provide a comparative basis for staged CGAC selection and highlight the need for continuous-flow breakthrough tests,multi-cycle regeneration experiments, and validation with real wastewater matrices before practical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: