Randomized trial optimizes nautical anchorage locations, indicating a reliable method for spatial planning.
The increasing complexity of marine spatial management and the rapid growth of nautical tourism require the use of formal and transparent decision-making models. Identifying optimal locations for nautical anchorages is a multi-criteria decision problem (MCDP) in which navigation safety, spatial constraints, and environmental protection often conflict. This study presents an integrated framework combining Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods for the systematic evaluation and ranking of nautical anchorages. As a case study, 86 potential locations in Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia, were analysed based on 18 criteria encompassing hydrological, meteorological, and spatial factors, as well as risk factors relevant to navigation safety. The methodological approach applies six MCDM methods implemented in the R programming language: Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), ViseKriterijska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Rjesenje (VIKOR), Multi-Objective Optimisation on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA), Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS), Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS), and Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). To reduce methodological bias, a final Consensus rank was calculated to synthesise the results of all applied methods. The stability of the obtained ranking was examined through an analysis of rank agreement between methods, using a diagonal matrix of rank overlaps and the corresponding heatmap visualisation. The results indicate a high level of consistency among individual MCDM methods and strong stability of the final consensus ranking. The proposed model ranks locations from best to worst based on how well they meet the established criteria, while ensuring strict navigational safety and compliance with environmental constraints. These findings confirm that the integrated GIS–MCDM approach is a reliable, repeatable, and scientifically grounded tool for supporting spatial planning and concession allocation in the development of nautical infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pušić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: