Key result
Higher polygenic risk linked to ~43% greater odds of missing LDL-C targets on statins.
Why the study?
Does a multiancestry polygenic risk score predict failure to achieve LDL-C goals in statin users?
Cohort (n=87,186)
Yes
Does a multiancestry polygenic risk score predict failure to achieve LDL-C goals in statin users?
Odds Ratio: 1.43 (95% CI 1.37–1.49)
A multiancestry polygenic risk score can identify individuals at higher risk of failing to achieve LDL-C goals on statin therapy, potentially guiding earlier treatment intensification.
BACKGROUND: Genetic differences may contribute to interindividual variability in LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) lowering with statin therapy. Polygenic risk scores may help identify individuals unlikely to achieve guideline-concordant LDL-C targets on statins, enabling earlier therapy intensification. METHODS: We developed a multiancestry polygenic risk score for statin nongoal response (PRS-NGR) and evaluated its association with failure to achieve an on-statin LDL-C level of ≤70 mg/dL and with percent LDL-C reduction. This longitudinal cohort study used genotyping and electronic health record-linked data from the All of Us Research Program (2018-2025), the UK Biobank (2014-2023), and the Biobank Japan (2003-2008). Participants were statin users with at least 1 prestatin and 1 on-statin LDL-C measurement. Associations were assessed overall and by genetic ancestry, with replication in the UK Biobank and Biobank Japan. RESULTS: The study included 46 564 participants from All of Us, 37 009 from the UK Biobank, and 3613 from Biobank Japan. In All of Us, higher PRS-NGR was associated with increased odds of nongoal response (odds ratio per SD, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.37-1.49]). Compared with the middle quintile, individuals in the top 1% had a higher risk, whereas those in the bottom 1% had a lower risk of nongoal response. Associations of PRS-NGR were consistent across African, European, and Latin American ancestry groups. Each SD increase in PRS-NGR corresponded to a 1.2-percentage-point smaller LDL-C reduction. Findings were replicated in the UK Biobank (odds ratio per SD, 2.39 [95% CI, 2.23-2.57]) and in Biobank Japan (odds ratio per SD, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.17-1.46]). Integration of PRS-NGR with guideline-based criteria identified individuals who derived a higher LDL-C% change and increased identification of statin-eligible individuals. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a multiancestry polygenic risk score that estimates the risk of nongoal LDL-C response to statin therapy. Incorporation of polygenic risk into lipid-lowering treatment paradigms may improve risk stratification and support more tailored therapy intensification strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liou et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Statin therapy / LDL-C lowering (n=87,186). Polygenic risk score for statin nongoal response (PRS-NGR) vs. Lower PRS-NGR was evaluated on Failure to achieve an on-statin LDL-C level of ≤70 mg/dL (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.37-1.49). A higher polygenic risk score for statin nongoal response was associated with increased odds of failing to achieve an on-statin LDL-C level ≤70 mg/dL (OR per SD 1.43; 95% CI 1.37-1.49).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: