Retrospective study evaluates faricimab outcomes in vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema, indicating potential effectiveness.
Background/Objectives: Faricimab is a novel bispecific antibody simultaneously inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2). Its efficacy in vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME), a setting with altered intravitreal pharmacokinetics, remains poorly characterized. We evaluated the 12-month outcomes of intravitreal faricimab (IVF) for DME in eyes vitrectomized for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 12 consecutive eyes of 11 patients (mean age 59.4 ± 10.5 years) with DME after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for PDR who received IVF (6 mg/0.05 mL) between September 2022 and August 2024 with at least 12 months of follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed at baseline (BL), 6 months (M6), and 12 months (M12). Results: Eight eyes were treatment-naïve and 4 had been switched from prior anti-VEGF therapy. Two eyes (16.7%) required a change in therapy: one for intraocular inflammation and one for inadequate anatomical response. In the 10 eyes that continued IVF, the mean number of injections was 4.1 ± 1.9. CRT decreased significantly from 489.5 ± 95.9 µm at BL to 328.5 ± 74.7 µm at M6 (p = 0.0065) and 307.0 ± 64.3 µm at M12 (p = 0.0023; repeated-measures ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test). Mean BCVA improved from 0.33 ± 0.26 to 0.23 ± 0.21 logMAR at M12 (p = 0.0894). Conclusions: In this small retrospective study of vitrectomized eyes with DME after PPV for PDR, IVF was associated with significant anatomical improvement, while visual acuity remained stable over 12 months, with a relatively low injection burden. Faricimab may be a useful therapeutic option in this challenging population, although larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: