Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey evaluates naloxone distribution differences by demographics in North Carolina, indicating disparities.
The objective of this study was to identify naloxone distribution resources, as well as to evaluate potential differences in naloxone distribution by demographic population utilizing a naloxone distribution score. We utilized a cross-sectional online survey of potential no-cost naloxone distributors in North Carolina (NC) to identify their program type, where programs distribute no-cost naloxone, and to whom no-cost naloxone distribution was distributed in 2023. This information was utilized to create a naloxone distribution measure at the ZIP code level. A total of 241 survey responses for programs were identified as distributors of no-cost naloxone to community members in NC. At least one no-cost naloxone distributor served all demographic populations in over 92% of NC ZIP codes. The Non-Hispanic (NH) White group had the highest mean naloxone distribution score of 30.2 (SD = 8.9) across all ZIP codes, suggesting greater distribution to this demographic. After adjusting for the size of the race/ethnicity population in GEE models, all minority race/ethnicity groups had significantly lower naloxone distribution than the NH White group. The naloxone distribution score calculated suggests NH White populations may be served by no-cost naloxone distributors more frequently when compared to other populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: