Analyzes land-use impact on carbon storage in ecologically diverse regions, indicating critical ecological insights.
Terrestrial ecosystems serve as key carbon reservoirs and contribute substantially to global carbon cycling and climate regulation. Shaanxi Province (SP) is located along China’s north–south geographical boundary and climatic transition zone, making it crucial to understand how carbon stocks change within its ecosystems. This study analyzed the land-use patterns, influencing factors, and spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon storage across three regions (Shanbei, Guanzhong, and Shannan) in SP. The results indicated that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, cropland and barren land areas in SP decreased significantly, while the forest land area increased markedly. Total carbon storage in SP increased from 1688.55 Tg in 2000 to 1726.12 Tg in 2020, with the highest accumulation observed in Shannan, followed by Shanbei and Guanzhong. (2) Forest land acted as the most significant carbon sink; its contribution to SP’s total carbon storage increased from 54.98% in 2000 to 60.28% in 2020. (3) Carbon storage across the three regions was positively correlated with elevation, slope, soil silt content, and precipitation, but negatively correlated with soil sand content, gross domestic product, and population distribution. (4) Geographical detector analysis identified precipitation as the key influencing factor for carbon storage in Shanbei and Guanzhong, whereas the primary factors in Shannan were temperature, elevation, and slope. This study recommends future land use priorities: maintaining grassland dominance in Shanbei, scientifically optimizing the planning of cropland and impervious land in Guanzhong, and sustaining current forest protection and management in Shannan. These results provide vital quantitative support and important references for ecologically sustainable development and the realization of China’s dual-carbon goals in SP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: