The paper demonstrates a new perspective on consciousness in complex systems, indicating its emergence as a natural outcome of physical processes.
The emergence of consciousness is traditionally viewed either as a consequence of the unique nature of humans or as an improbable coincidence in an indifferent universe. Both positions assume that consciousness is an anomaly requiring a special explanation beyond established physical principles. This paper proposes a third way: consciousness is a natural consequence of physical processes in open systems with a sufficient energy gradient—not an anomaly, but one of the manifestations of the general logic of complexity. The central framework of the work is the identification of a structurally self-similar pattern of “gradient → retention → pole → transition,” operating as a self-similar mechanism at all scales, from the formation of a dissipative structure to the cosmological cycle. Six fields traditionally developed independently—Prigogine’s non-equilibrium thermodynamics, Haken and Kauffman’s theory of complex systems, Friston’s active inference, Deacon’s biosemiotics and teledynamics, Tononi’s theory of integrated information, and discussions of cyclic cosmological models—turn out, with a certain shift in emphasis, to be projections of a single structurally self-similar process onto different scales. The six-step ladder—dissipative structure, autopoiesis, proto-agency, consciousness, and the recursively complexifying conscious system—is not merely one object of the theory among others, but its basic pattern, through which all the processes it encompasses are described. Each step is defined by the type of operations on the system’s states; each transition is defined by a minimal condition based on established formalisms. Each subsequent step inherits all the gradients of the previous ones and adds a new one of its own type; simultaneously, increasingly stable mechanisms of resistance to disintegration accumulate. The structure of transitions is probabilistic: the conditions for each transition are necessary but not sufficient in a deterministic sense, and the realization of each transition is stochastic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oleg Mitin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: