Develops a thermal comfort-aware pedestrian routing framework for heat-resilient navigation.
Urban heat island effects increasingly challenge pedestrian mobility by intensifying thermal stress and reducing the attractiveness of walking during hot periods. However, most pedestrian routing systems still prioritize distance or travel time, while environmental conditions such as heat exposure and shade are rarely incorporated into operational route generation. Existing comfort-aware approaches often rely on static maps, simulated microclimatic indicators, or descriptive greenery measures, limiting their direct integration into user-configurable pedestrian navigation. This study develops a thermal comfort-aware pedestrian routing framework that integrates heterogenic data sources including observed land surface temperature, pedestrian-perspective tree-canopy coverage, and network distance into a unified multi-criteria pathfinding model. The workflow proceeds in four steps: first, airborne thermal imagery is processed to derive a high-resolution land surface temperature layer; second, Google Street View images are sampled at street-segment locations and segmented using SegFormer to extract visible tree-canopy coverage; third, both environmental indicators are aggregated to a cleaned pedestrian network; and fourth, normalized distance, temperature, and canopy attributes are combined through a user-adjustable edge-cost formulation and solved using Dijkstra’s algorithm. The framework is implemented as an operational web-based routing tool for the historic center of Clermont-Ferrand, France. The routable graph includes 551 nodes and 796 edges, with 600 segments carrying GSV-derived canopy information and 623 segments carrying airborne-derived LST values. Across the network, we observed LST ranges from 19.5 °C to 39.1 °C, while canopy coverage ranged from 0 to 70.6%. For a representative origin–destination pair, the coolest route reduces average LST by nearly 5 °C and almost triples canopy coverage compared with the shortest path, although at the cost of a 72% longer distance. These results demonstrate that the framework can generate interpretable comfort–efficiency trade-offs and support user-comfort pathfinding as an operational approach for heat-resilient pedestrian navigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mansour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: