Investigates reservoir characteristics in igneous rocks, suggesting distinct pore behavior for evaluation.
The quantitative characterization of microscopic pore structure has long been a challenge in reservoir evaluation for igneous reservoirs, owing to their pronounced heterogeneity and complex pore geometry. In this study, thin-section casting, X-ray diffraction, high-pressure mercury intrusion, nuclear magnetic resonance, and fractal theory were employed to investigate the reservoir-space types, pore-structure characteristics, and fractal features of the igneous rocks both quantitatively and qualitatively. The relationships among reservoir petrophysical properties, pore structure, movable-fluid saturation, and fractal dimension were examined. The results indicate that the reservoirs in the study area are characterized by medium-to-low porosity and medium-to-low permeability, with mean values of 6.57% and 2.06 mD, respectively; the storage performance of andesite was found to exceed that of tuff. Based on the morphology of the mercury intrusion curves and the petrophysical parameters, the reservoirs were classified into three categories. From Class I to Class III, the displacement pressure increased progressively, the movable-fluid saturation declined from 9.65% to 8.54%, and the heterogeneity was markedly enhanced. The fractal analysis revealed that the reservoirs exhibit distinct piecewise fractal behavior with a well-defined inflection point, allowing two fractal intervals to be distinguished: large pore-throats (D1) and small pore-throats (D2). The mean total fractal dimension was 2.8996, and the large pore-throat fractal dimension (mean = 2.9607) exceeded that of the small pore-throats (mean = 2.3863), indicating that large pore-throats serve not only as the principal contributor to reservoir space but also as the dominant control on heterogeneity. Correlation analysis demonstrated that D1 is significantly negatively correlated with both porosity and permeability, making it a key indicator for evaluating reservoir flow capacity, whereas D2 is positively correlated with petrophysical properties, reflecting the role of fine throats in improving the connectivity of isolated pores. Notably, the large-pore-throat fractal dimension (D1) of these igneous reservoirs generally exceeds that of tight sandstone, whereas the small-pore-throat fractal dimension (D2) is positively correlated with petrophysical properties rather than negatively, in contrast to sandstone reservoirs; this indicates that the pore-structure behavior of igneous reservoirs is distinct from that of conventional clastic reservoirs. This study offers a new perspective on the quantitative characterization of pore structure in igneous reservoirs and provides a scientific basis for reservoir evaluation and exploration-and-development efforts in the study area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: