Key result
Lower educational level is linked to ~61% higher obesity risk, driving downstream cardiometabolic disparities.
Why the study?
Does obesity explain the association between socioeconomic position and cardiometabolic risk in working-age adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=3,108)
Does obesity explain the association between socioeconomic position and cardiometabolic risk in working-age adults?
Odds Ratio: 1.61 (95% CI 1.18–2.21)
Obesity appears to be a major explanatory factor for the socioeconomic inequalities observed in cardiometabolic risk among working-age adults.
Background. Cardiometabolic diseases are strongly socially patterned, with individuals of lower socioeconomic position experiencing a disproportionate burden of metabolic disorders. Obesity has been proposed as a potential explanatory factor that may partly account for the association between social disadvantage and adverse cardiometabolic profiles. This study aimed to evaluate whether obesity may partly explain the observed associations between socioeconomic position and multiple cardiometabolic outcomes. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 3108 working-age adults undergoing occupational health examinations in the Balearic Islands, Spain. Socioeconomic position was assessed using educational attainment and occupational category. Cardiometabolic outcomes included obesity, FLI-defined probable steatotic liver disease (FLI ≥ 60), insulin resistance, atherogenic risk, and metabolic syndrome. Multivariable logistic regression models with sequential adjustment were performed. Additional models evaluated attenuation after inclusion of obesity. Mediation analyses were conducted using bootstrapping methods. Results. A clear socioeconomic gradient was observed across all cardiometabolic outcomes, with higher prevalence among individuals with lower educational attainment (p for trend < 0.001). In fully adjusted models, lower educational level remained significantly associated with obesity (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.18–2.21), whereas associations with the remaining cardiometabolic outcomes were substantially attenuated after adjustment. Inclusion of obesity reduced effect estimates for FLI-defined probable steatotic liver disease (FLI ≥ 60), insulin resistance, atherogenic risk, and metabolic syndrome by approximately 53–72%. Exploratory mediation analyses suggested that obesity was associated with approximately 28% attenuation of the association with estimated steatotic liver disease risk and 8% attenuation of the association with insulin resistance. Conclusions. Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiometabolic risk were evident across multiple metabolic domains. Obesity was associated with substantial attenuation of several downstream cardiometabolic associations and may represent an important explanatory factor associated with the observed socioeconomic differences in metabolic health, particularly for estimated steatotic liver disease risk. However, the magnitude of these associations varied across outcomes, and the cross-sectional design precludes causal interpretation. These findings support the importance of addressing obesity within its broader social context as a potential strategy to reduce metabolic health inequalities among employed working-age adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herrero et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk (n=3,108). Lower educational attainment vs. Higher educational attainment was evaluated on Obesity (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.18-2.21). Lower educational level was significantly associated with obesity (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.18-2.21), which substantially attenuated the associations with downstream cardiometabolic risks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: