Key result
Lower socio-economic status is linked to ~19% lower odds of metabolic syndrome vs. middle status.
Why the study?
Socio-economic status has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease, but its relationship with traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in this population required investigation.
Does socio-economic status affect the prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in adults in Iran?
Cross-Sectional (n=8,733)
No
Does socio-economic status affect the prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in adults in Iran?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a developing country setting, lower socio-economic status was associated with lower odds of metabolic syndrome and hypertension, contrasting with patterns typically seen in high-income countries.
Background and Aims Socio‐economic status (SES) has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease. We aimed to investigate the relationship between SES and traditional risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in 35 to 65 adults of the MASHAD cohort study drawn from the second biggest city in Iran, Mashhad with a population of almost 3 million. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, subjects were divided into three categories of SES status based on their education level, employment status, and monthly income using latent class analysis (LCA). The three SES of low, medium, and high classes were compared in terms of cardiovascular disease risk factors including diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. p value less than 0.05 was considered as significant. Results A total number of 9704 participants were included in the study. According to goodness‐of‐fit measures and entropy the three‐class model is the most optimal and suitable model here. Participants with a low SES had significantly lower means of age, physical activity level, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure and LDL‐C, and higher means of weight, and hip circumferences. Also, the prevalence of smoking, hypertension and metabolic syndrome were lower in low SES group than the two other groups. Logistic regression showed that the odds of obesity in the high SES class was 1.3‐fold higher than for the middle SES class. Moreover, the chance of metabolic syndrome and hypertension in the low SES class was respectively 0.81 and 0.83 of the middle SES class. Conclusion Lower socio‐economic was associated with metabolic syndrome and hypertension and obesity was associated with higher SES ; it may therefore be necessary to develop more specific and personalized preventive policies for populations in each socio‐economic class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadabadi et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=8,733). Socio-economic status (SES) vs. Middle SES was evaluated on Metabolic syndrome (OR 0.811, 95% CI 0.732-0.898, p=<0.001). Lower socio-economic status was associated with lower odds of metabolic syndrome and hypertension compared to middle socio-economic status, while higher status was associated with obesity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: