Theoretical model examines vacuum as a network, revealing new insights into quantum relationships.
In the preceding work we presented the world as a self-validating system — existence as mutual confirmation transmitted in finite time — and recovered classical physics from that single requirement, with the quantum sector given a coherent interpretation and an explicit boundary. Here we carry the construction to the vacuum. The vacuum is presented as a network whose nodes are normal particles and whose links are quantum acts: neither component exists without the other, and quanta are therefore constituents of the vacuum rather than residents in it. From this construction follow, each with its stated status: a structural reading of virtual particles (four known properties from one closed configuration); the removal of the vacuum catastrophe given a physical criterion of participation — within the model's chosen g(ω) the criterion restates the no-quantum-links postulate dynamically, so the removal is conditional on that criterion, not derived independently of it; the synchronised-cluster mean replaces the sum over modes, and the residue law ε = σ²/(2K²), derived analytically and confirmed numerically (R² = 0.9992), shows the 10¹²⁰ discrepancy to be a category error, an extensive sum compared against an intensive residue; a translation of the cosmological-constant problem from fine tuning into node homogeneity (σ/K ≈ 5×10⁻⁶²), with quantum identity as a motivating analogy and the value of Λ itself left underived; the photon read as confirmation transfer, with the limit c as the network's tick tempo and masslessness as zero delay; isotropy of an ordered network through the geometrylessness of quantum links; and a double-slit study in which the dynamics delivers a distribution while the point is chosen by the act of assembly — with the Born square, derived in Paper 1 from the counting axiom, here given a structural carrier in the field regime: the square of the tick, θ²_t (the assembly-weight route whose identity with the counting square the now-built bridge makes testable), and asymmetric-slit setups identified as the discriminator between assembly hypotheses. Every claim carries its status. The bridge between the two model regimes — first among the debts named at first writing — is now built in the linear and solitonic regime by the subsequent bridge work; five open debts remain. Simulation code and full numerical protocols are in the Supplementary Material and the open repository. Code: https://github.com/ivan-denysov/finite-validation-vacuum
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivan Denysov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: