Article explores how outer space imaginaries shape security governance, indicating significant implications for policy.
Outer space is increasingly the site of political tensions. At the same time, the growing role played by private actors in space creates opportunities and challenges for defence and security. This article aims to unravel how outer space imaginaries influence the practice and decisions regarding outer space (security) governance. Adopting a deconstructive approach informed by critical geopolitics, it identifies dominant and competing discourses about outer space that are underpinned by material and ideational factors. We demonstrate how, in combination, these discourses have shaped practices by various actors of the space community and normalized a highly technical approach to challenges, solutions and governance, contributing to a ‘privatization-securitization nexus’ in outer space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Germond et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: