Analyzes thermodynamic stability of hexagonal and cubic ice phases, suggesting size dependence impacts their stability.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Among the more than 20 known crystalline phases of ice, hexagonal (I h ) and cubic (I c ) ice are the dominant polymorphs at ambient pressure. Their relative thermodynamic stability and competition have been the subject of extensive investigation. This work presents a systematic study of the free energy landscape spanning from small clusters to the bulk for both polymorphs using a lattice-based aggregation-volume-bias Monte Carlo (LB-AVBMC) approach. Simulations were performed with the TIP4 P /2005 water model at 300 K. Although this temperature exceeds the model’s melting point, the lattice constraint stabilizes crystalline clusters even at small sizes. It was found that the relative stability of I h and I c exhibits nontrivial size dependence, with their free energies interweaving in the small-cluster regime. Nucleation free energies computed for large clusters were analyzed within the Tolman-corrected classical nucleation theory framework to extrapolate bulk chemical potentials. While I h is more stable than I c, both crystalline phases remain thermodynamically metastable relative to the liquid phase at 300 K. By combining bulk chemical potentials with enthalpy data obtained from additional NpT simulations, the melting temperature is estimated to be around 250 K, in good agreement with previous studies. The enthalpy difference between I h and I c is approximately 20 J/mol at 300 K and decreases with decreasing temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bin Chen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: