This term-by-term dictionary translates FRC terminology into established physics terms, indicating how concepts overlap.
A term-by-term dictionary between Fractal Resonance Coherence (FRC) and established physics, written for a reader who already knows thermodynamics, dynamical systems, and quantum foundations. Its purpose is to make good on FRC's standing claim that it invents none of its parts: each FRC object is mapped to the mainstream concept whose shape it borrows (Kuramoto/Haken order parameter, Onsager–Prigogine irreversible thermodynamics, Landauer's principle, Bohm–Valentini quantum equilibrium, Ruelle–Pollicott resonances, Landau–Ginzburg relaxational dynamics), with the relationship labeled honestly as same-shape-as, borrowed-from, or genuinely-new-bet. A false-friends section lists FRC terms a physicist will misread if the everyday meaning is imported. A closing section isolates the small set of claims that are actually FRC's own — the falsifiable bets, not the vocabulary — and lists the kills already taken. The discipline is: borrow the shape for the established parts, and stake novelty only on the losable predictions. Part of the Fractal Resonance Coherence (FRC) corpus. Front door and canonical DOI ledger: fractalresonance.com.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadi Servat (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: