Key result
Atrial functional MR in AF and HFpEF stems from left atrial dynamics, requiring distinct management.
Why the study?
The occurrence of functional MR in AF and/or HFpEF has remained largely unspoken, and current guidelines do not emphasize the need to differentiate atrial functional MR from ventricular secondary MR.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support hemodynamic monitoring in atrial functional MR; leaves open whether interventions improve outcomes in larger trials.
Unlike secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of left ventricular (LV) disease, the occurrence of functional MR in atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has remained largely unspoken. LV size and systolic function are typically normal, whereas isolated mitral annular dilation and inadequate leaflet adaptation are considered mechanistic culprits. Moreover, the role of left atrial and annular dynamics in provoking MR is often underappreciated. Because of this peculiar pathophysiology, atrial functional MR benefits from a different approach compared with secondary MR. Although both AF and HFpEF-two closely related disease epidemics of the 21st century-are held responsible, current guidelines do not emphasize the need to differentiate atrial functional MR from (ventricular) secondary MR. This review summarizes the prevalence and prognostic importance of atrial functional MR, providing mechanistic insights compared with those of secondary MR and suggesting potential therapeutic targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deferm et al. (2019) conducted a review in Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation. Atrial functional mitral regurgitation in atrial fibrillation and HFpEF is driven by left atrial and annular dynamics, requiring a distinct approach compared with ventricular secondary MR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: