Key result
64-slice CT accurately detects coronary lesions with ~97% specificity but poorly quantifies stenosis severity.
Why the study?
Does 64-slice CT accurately identify and quantify coronary lesions compared to catheter-based angiography and IVUS in patients with stable angina pectoris?
Observational (n=59)
Does 64-slice CT accurately identify and quantify coronary lesions compared to catheter-based angiography and IVUS in patients with stable angina pectoris?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
64-slice CT provides excellent accuracy for identifying proximal coronary lesions but has limited ability to exactly quantify the degree of stenosis compared to invasive angiography and IVUS.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography (CT) to identify and quantify atherosclerotic coronary lesions in comparison with catheter-based angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). BACKGROUND: Currently, the ability of multislice CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis and dimensions of coronary plaques has not been evaluated. METHODS: We included 59 patients scheduled for coronary angiography due to stable angina pectoris. A contrast-enhanced 64-slice CT (Senation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) was performed before the invasive angiogram. In a subset of 18 patients, IVUS of 32 vessels was part of the catheterization procedure. RESULTS: In 55 of 59 patients, 64-slice CT enabled the visualization of the entire coronary tree with diagnostic image quality (American Heart Association 15-segment model). The overall correlation between the degree of stenosis detected by quantitative coronary angiography compared with 64-slice CT was r = 0.54. Sensitivity for the detection of stenosis <50%, stenosis >50%, and stenosis >75% was 79%, 73%, and 80%, respectively, and specificity was 97%. In comparison with IVUS, 46 of 55 (84%) lesions were identified correctly. The mean plaque areas and the percentage of vessel obstruction measured by IVUS and 64-slice CT were 8.1 mm2 versus 7.3 mm2 (p < 0.03, r = 0.73) and 50.4% versus 41.1% (p < 0.001, r = 0.61), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced 64-slice CT is a clinically robust modality that allows the identification of proximal coronary lesions with excellent accuracy. Measurements of plaque and lumen areas derived by CT correlated well with IVUS. A major limitation is the insufficient ability of CT to exactly quantify the degree of stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leber et al. (2005) conducted an observational in stable angina pectoris (n=59). 64-slice computed tomography (CT) vs. catheter-based angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was evaluated on Correlation between the degree of stenosis detected by quantitative coronary angiography compared with 64-slice CT (r = 0.54). 64-slice CT identified coronary lesions with high specificity and moderate sensitivity, but had insufficient ability to exactly quantify the degree of stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: