Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper proposes a dual-stage framework for question answering over oil and gas pipeline topologies by coupling a lightweight topology-first knowledge graph with large language models. The framework first performs schema-aligned structural parsing and generates Cypher queries for execution in Neo4j. When direct structured querying cannot provide a reliable answer, it extracts a bounded five-hop local subgraph and performs LLM-based reasoning within this restricted context. By doing so, the method retains the precision of graph querying while reducing the noise and context burden associated with full-graph prompting. Experiments on a representative natural-gas transmission network with 100-, 200-, and 500-node graph instances show that the proposed approach achieves higher end-to-end F1-scores than full-graph and fixed-hop baselines while remaining feasible at larger graph scales. Further analysis indicates that bounded subgraph retrieval offers a better balance between coverage and compactness, although multi-hop questions remain more challenging than one-hop questions. These findings suggest that combining structured graph querying with localized graph-grounded reasoning provides a practical solution for industrial topology question answering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: