Key result
Race-neutral 2022-GLI equation hypothesized to alter COPD trial eligibility compared to Choi's equation.
Why the study?
Switching to the race-neutral 2022-GLI reference equation affects the identification and severity of ventilatory defects, but its impact on participant eligibility for pharmaceutical RCTs in COPD remains unclear.
Does applying the 2022-GLI reference equation compared to Choi's reference equation change the proportion of patients eligible for pharmaceutical RCTs in a northeast Asian COPD cohort?
Cohort
Does applying the 2022-GLI reference equation compared to Choi's reference equation change the proportion of patients eligible for pharmaceutical RCTs in a northeast Asian COPD cohort?
May alter COPD trial eligibility in northeast Asian cohorts; leaves open effects on equity and RCT generalizability.
Extract Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) percent-predicted is a common eligibility criterion for pharmaceutical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). [1, 2] The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) recently introduced the race-neutral 2022-GLI reference equation to provide a unified global standard for lung function prediction, driven by concerns over health equity and the use of race as a biological variable. [3] Previous studies show that switching from other existing reference equations to 2022-GLI reference equation affects both the identification and severity of ventilatory defects. [4–6] To further understand its influence on patient care, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of adopting 2022-GLI reference equation on participant eligibility for pharmaceutical RCTs in COPD. Choi's reference equation, derived from a Korean population, has been widely used in clinical practice and research in Korea [7, 8]; however, its applicability may be limited by its population-specific nature and differences from more recently developed global reference equations. We hypothesized that, compared to Choi's reference equation, applying 2022-GLI reference equation for percent-predicted values of FEV₁ would change the proportions of patients eligible for pharmaceutical RCTs of COPD, and health outcomes would differ according to the concordance of trial eligibility status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 2022-GLI reference equation vs. Choi's reference equation was evaluated on Proportions of patients eligible for pharmaceutical RCTs of COPD. The 2022-GLI reference equation was hypothesized to alter COPD trial eligibility compared to Choi's equation, but no quantitative results are reported in the abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: