Demonstrates C–H bond activation in boron systems, suggesting new pathways for selectivity.
The identification of the true active site in boron-catalyzed oxidative dehydrogenation of propane (ODHP) remains deeply contested. Prevailing models attempt to describe a molten or quasi-molten boron oxide phase using static, high-energy BO x species, yet they do not resolve a central paradox that explains how a formally nonreducible B(III) center can mediate efficient C–H activation while sustaining exceptional propylene selectivity. Here, by combining exhaustive thermodynamic screening of 9700 BO x /Ni(111) configurations with enhanced sampling ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD), we show that activity is mediated not by any pre-existing structure but by transiently accessible overcoordinated [BO 4 ] generated through continuous [BO 3 ] ⇌ [BO 4 ] interconversions. This dynamic sp 2 -to-sp 3 rehybridization provides crucial coordination-charge compensation, acting as an electronic buffer that allows the strictly +3 boron center to activate C–H bonds without localized reduction. Furthermore, mapping the catalytic cycle provides a mechanistic framework for the selectivity paradox. The structurally adaptive boron centers thermodynamically favor the adsorption of gas-phase oxygenated radicals, suppressing chain propagation and thereby preventing deep oxidation to CO x . Finally, AIMD trajectories and free-energy barriers across N-doped, C-doped, metal-free, and h-BN-derived BO x systems show that this coordination-fluxionality mechanism is general across the BO x systems examined here, shifting catalyst design from identifying a single “active site” to engineering the thermodynamic accessibility and lifetime of transient coordination states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: