Examines construct validity of the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale in Czechia, indicating its reliability for assessing environmental distress.
Eco-anxiety has emerged as an important construct in environmental psychology. The Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS-13), which consists of 13 items, is a multidimensional instrument designed to assess affective symptoms, rumination, behavioral responses, and anxiety related to environmental issues. This study examined the psychometric properties of the HEAS-13 in a general population sample from Czechia. The study assessed the scale’s validity in relation to generalized anxiety and self-reported housing damage associated with adverse weather-related events. Data were collected by conducting face-to-face interviews with a population-based sample in Czechia (n = 1027), with respondents selected using address-based sampling. The psychometric evaluation included descriptive statistics, an internal consistency analysis, inter-item correlations, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) based on principal axis factoring with oblimin rotation, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using a Weighted Least Squares Mean and Variance (WLSMV) estimator appropriate for ordinal indicators, and convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity testing. The HEAS-13 demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.962; McDonald’s omega = 0.958 for the total scale). EFA supported the original four-factor structure and CFA showed a good fit of the original model. Score distributions were positively skewed, and substantial floor effects indicated generally low levels of eco-anxiety symptom endorsement in the general population. The HEAS-13 total score was strongly correlated with the GAD-7 (rho = 0.839) supporting convergence with generalized anxiety, but also indicating possible construct overlap. Known-groups validity was supported by higher HEAS-13 scores among respondents reporting hazard-related home damage. Measurement invariance was examined across sex and age groups. The HEAS-13 appears to be a reliable and structurally well-fitted instrument for assessing multidimensional eco-anxiety in population-based research. The results provide evidence that the construct is meaningfully associated with generalized anxiety and experience of environmentally disruptive events. The HEAS-13 may serve as a useful tool for future research on environmental distress and climate- and environment-related mental health. It may also be useful for studies examining risk perception as an explanatory, associated, or contextual variable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiří Remr (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: