What question did this study set out to answer?

To establish the importance of human judgment in the peer review process and outline the responsibilities of reviewers.

On the defence of responsible human judgement in peer review

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To establish the importance of human judgment in the peer review process and outline the responsibilities of reviewers.
Examines the elements that contribute to effective peer review, such as fairness and expertise.
Discusses the risks associated with relying on artificial intelligence tools in peer review.
Promotes collaboration among editors, reviewers, and authors to uphold peer review standards.
Highlights the negative consequences of egotistical behavior and coercion in peer review.
Emphasizes that peer review should not be outsourced to AI, maintaining integrity and trust.
Reaffirms that human experts must conduct assessments without bias or manipulation.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

This article clarifies the role of reviewers in ensuring fair assessment of scientific work, highlighting the importance of human expertise.

Soares et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This article clarifies the role of reviewers in ensuring fair assessment of scientific work, highlighting the importance of human expertise.