The methodology for calculating distributed atom–atom polarizabilities within the minimal basis iterative Stockholder partitioning framework is extended to coupled cluster (CC2, CCSD, CC3) and multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) wave functions, as well as to frequency-dependent perturbations. The bond capacity, defined as the rank-0 atom–atom polarizability, is benchmarked on small molecules at equilibrium geometries, where various DFT functionals show good agreement with the CC3 reference. The same conclusion holds when probing geometry dependence through a change in the bond angle or dihedral angle, but a significant deviation is observed between the methods for reaction pathways such as S N 2. The MCSCF implementation is used to study the values for bond breaking, where the rank-0 contribution to the molecular dipole polarizability is found to dominate for various systems. Non-nuclear sites for describing out-of-plane polarizability at the charge-only level are also explored but found to be ineffective with ab initio-derived parameters. Dynamic bond capacities at real and imaginary frequencies are presented and display method dependence consistent with that of the static values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikkelsen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: