The Preponderance of Evidence Indicates That the Eastern North American Monarch Population Has Declined in All Stages of Its Annual Cycle. Reply to Davis, A.K. Comment on “Oberhauser, K.S. Eastern North American Monarch Butterfly Conservation Needs and Opportunities: What the Science Tells Us. Insects 2026, 17, 235”

Davis critiqued a recent review, “Eastern North American Monarch Butterfly Conservation Needs and Opportunities: What the Science Tells Us”. He argued that Eastern North American monarch numbers in the summer have not declined, despite dramatic declines in the area covered by this population in Mexico during the winter. These declines in winter numbers, he said, can be explained by increasing mortality during the fall migration and subsequent density-dependent increases the following spring. A strong impetus for these arguments appears to be Davis’s concern that recommendations by “certain circles” of the monarch research community could steer conservation funding toward a species that does not need our help. Here, we address these concerns, and note that there is no evidence that conservation funding focused on providing breeding habitat for monarchs detracts from conservation for other species in need of help, or from efforts to support migrating monarchs.