Review synthesizes plant-derived anticancer compounds across lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers, revealing shared mechanisms and challenges in translation.
Lung, breast, colorectal and prostate cancer account for over 41% of global cancer incidence and 39% of mortality, yet durable control of advanced disease remains limited. Plant secondary metabolites are promising multitarget leads, but their polypharmacological mechanisms cannot be captured by single-target approaches, and the evidence across these four cancers has not been synthesised within a unified framework. This review provides an integrated comparative analysis of network-pharmacology studies of plant-derived anticancer compounds across the four cancers, cataloguing phytochemical profiles, identifying shared and cancer-specific targets, quantifying the concordance between computational predictions and experimental validation, and appraising the translational gap. A systematic search of biomedical databases (2016–2026) identified 101 peer-reviewed studies (40 breast, 33 colorectal, 24 lung, and 14 prostate) combining network pharmacology with experimental validation. AKT1, EGFR, TP53, STAT3, MAPK1/3, CASP3, and HSP90AA1 recurred as cross-cancer hub genes, with the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways most frequently implicated. Cancer-specific signatures comprised the androgen receptor in prostate, the oestrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in breast, β-catenin/Wnt in colorectal, and the epidermal growth factor receptor/RAS axis with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition effectors in lung cancer. Flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, and polyphenols predominated. The persistent validation gap remains the principal barrier to translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merecz-Sadowska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: