Study estimates a regional price parity index using CPI data for U.S. cities, suggesting improved comparisons of urban economic performance.
Geographic price differences confound comparisons of economic performance across cities by conflating nominal urban advantages with real differences in well-being. Existing tools only partially address this problem: the Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes a Regional Price Parity (RPP) Index that represents relative price levels in US cities and states, but it is available only annually since 2008 and with a publication lag, limiting its usefulness for historical or high-frequency analysis. To address this measurement gap, we use the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for 29 US cities to construct a CPI-based RPP, enabling consistent comparisons of urban economic performance over time at constant and comparable prices. We exploit standard price-parity properties using publicly available CPI data to estimate CPI-based RPPs at a higher frequency and over longer historical horizons. This results in a CPI-based RPP for any period with published CPI data, as far back as 1913 in some cities to the most recent observations. By separating nominal urban advantages from cost-of-living differences, the index allows researchers to reassess claims about urban well-being, affordability, and the real returns to agglomeration. We demonstrate the index by examining long-run regional price dynamics and comparing real per capita GDP and real per capita personal income across cities at constant and comparable prices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bond‐Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: