Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective observational study evaluates skin surface changes and patient-reported outcomes in women, indicating possible benefits of a dermocosmetic regimen.
Background: Skin aging is influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors that alter skin texture and microrelief. Non-invasive imaging techniques enable objective longitudinal assessment of these characteristics. This study aimed to instrumentally and subjectively evaluate skin surface changes during a standardized 90-day dermocosmetic regimen containing multiple active ingredients. Methods: This prospective, single-arm observational study included 47 women aged 30–60 years with visible signs of facial skin aging. Participants applied a standardized anti-age serum and cream regimen twice daily for 90 days. Skin surface morphology was assessed at baseline and after 30, 60, and 90 days using Visioscan® VC 20plus imaging with SELS® software. Subjective outcomes were evaluated using a structured product questionnaire and the validated Skindex-16 instrument. Results: Significant temporal changes were observed across objective skin surface parameters. From baseline to day 90, mean skin roughness decreased from 4.99 ± 2.29 to 1.66 ± 0.67, while the wrinkle-related parameter decreased from 191.08 ± 87.26 to 74.27 ± 15.25. Reductions were also observed in scaliness, contrast, entropy, variance, and anisotropy, whereas smoothness, homogeneity, and energy increased over time. Skindex-16 scores decreased across Symptoms, Emotions, and Functioning domains, indicating lower participant-reported dermatology-related burden. The regimen was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusions: In this exploratory single-arm observational study, the standardized dermocosmetic regimen was associated with measurable longitudinal changes in Visioscan-derived skin surface parameters and patient-reported outcomes over 90 days. Because the study included no control group, the findings cannot establish causality or isolate the contribution of individual regimen components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golušin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: