Quasi-experimental study demonstrates improved antimicrobial use in a medical emergency unit, indicating the potential for nurse-led initiatives.
Background: Emergency departments in tertiary care are critical areas for decision-making regarding antimicrobial use,however, they are often underrepresented in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. This study evaluates the impact of a nurse-driven antimicrobial stewardship intervention in a medical emergency unit of a tertiary care facility. Methods: A quasi experimental pre–post study was conducted in the Emergency Medical Outpatient department in a tertiary care center. Following a baseline assessment of antimicrobial use patterns conducted by a team of trained stewardship nurses, salient intervention targets were identified and implemented. AMS nurses actively reviewed antimicrobial prescriptions, reinforced adherence to institutional guidelines, monitored device- related practices and diagnostic utilization, and participated in audit and feedback with clinical teams. Data on patient characteristics, infection type, culture practices, antibiotic use, and guideline adherence were collected and compared between pre-intervention and intervention phases. Results: Following the intervention, compliance with hospital antibiotic guidelines improved from 82.4% to 91.0%. The proportion of cultures collected before initiating antibiotics increased from 23% to 40.3%, with a corresponding rise in culture positivity from 8% to 22%. An increase in antibiotic de-escalation practices was also noted. Conclusions: This nurse-driven antimicrobial stewardship intervention was associated with more rational antimicrobial use, improved diagnostic utilization, and strengthened infection control practices. Integrating stewardship activities into nursing workflows represents a feasible approach to strengthening AMS in high-volume acute care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: