Study developed recommendations for transitional care in youth with chronic conditions, suggesting structured pathways for improved outcomes.
Introduction The transition from pediatric to adult health care is a critical yet often challenging process for young adults with chronic conditions, marked by fragmented communication, scarce resources, and a lack of standardized guidelines. The Italian TransiDEA project aimed to address these gaps by developing tailored transition recommendations for three clinical populations: young adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Type 1 diabetes (T1D), or epilepsy. Methods Using a Delphi consensus method, three multidisciplinary panels including clinicians, young adults, caregivers, and association members were conducted in parallel, each addressing one of the three clinical targets. Participants assessed and revised the transition guidelines adapted from international frameworks over two rounds of evaluation. Results After the first round, the overall agreement was above 75% for all three chronic conditions. The changes made to the statements based on the ratings and suggestions, led to high agreement (100%) in the second round. Discussion The final recommendations share key elements, including early transition planning (starting around age 16), the assignment of a named transition worker, and using standardized tools (e.g., transition readiness questionnaires). Condition-specific adaptations addressed unique needs, such as psychological support in ADHD, tailoring the process on a case-by-case basis depending on the clinical picture in epilepsy, and extended transition timelines (up to age 22) in T1D. Conclusion The TransiDEA project demonstrates the feasibility of structured yet flexible recommendations for transition pathways across chronic conditions, while encouraging systemic improvements to enhance care continuity. Despite these advances, challenges remain, including the need for future validation of the guidelines and tools and increased resource and institutional support to ensure equitable access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: