This article examines port investments in Turkey, revealing connections between state-capital relations and infrastructure development.
This article examines Chinese port investments in Turkey through the lens of state–capital relations in transnational infrastructure development. Analysing Chinese-invested Kumport, Singaporean-invested Mersin, and stalled Çandarlı, we interrogate how the Belt and Road Initiative intersects with Turkey's fragmented institutional landscape. Using a growth coalition framework and original elite interviews, we show that Chinese investment strategies are shaped not only by geoeconomic logics but also by political informality, regulatory volatility and absent industrial policy. The paper contributes to debates on the geographies of Chinese capital, variegated state capitalism and infrastructure governance under geopolitical competition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ergenç et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: