Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 12, 2026Journal of Documentation

The impact of intelligent recommender systems in digital libraries on the structure of scholarly reading and users' information trajectories

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ESE. V. SamokhodkinState University of ManagementAEA. A. ElzonState University of Management

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

This integrative review reveals how recommender systems influence scholarly reading structures, indicating implications for visibility and academic identity.

Key Points

  • This article aims to theorize the influence of intelligent recommender systems on scholarly reading and information trajectories.
  • Conducted an integrative literature review from 2019 to 2025.
  • Analyzed national and international research on digital libraries and recommender systems.
  • Synthesized findings into a multi-level conceptual framework.
  • Recommender modules shape early-career researchers' identities at the micro level.
  • At the macro level, they introduce biases leading to visibility asymmetries in scholarly communication.
  • Developed a three-level model illustrating algorithmic feedback loops affecting user behavior and academic visibility.

Cite This Study

Samokhodkin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5332484f7abc118adedc7ehttps://doi.org/10.1108/jd-02-2026-0083
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recommender Systems in the Era of Large Language Models (LLMs)2024 · 468 citations
  2. 2User Perceptions of Diversity in Recommender Systems2024 · 14 citations
  3. 3The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface1989 · 1,766 citations
  4. 4Exclusion of the non-English-speaking world from the scientific literature: Recommendations for change for addiction journals and publishers2022 · 69 citations
  5. 5Models in information behaviour research1999 · 2,096 citations