Examines how women's employment affects IPV during pregnancy, indicating significant implications for women's health.
Pregnancy increases a woman’s vulnerability to intimate partner violence (IPV) due to stressors like son preference, unintended pregnancy, women’s acceptance of IPV and partner’s alcohol abuse. While women’s employment is widely viewed as a pathway to greater empowerment, it may contradict normative gender expectations, provoking male backlash in India. Our study uses a sample of 58,993 ever-pregnant women from the National Family Health Survey data (NFHS-5,2019–21) to examine the nature of the association between a woman’s employment status and the experience of physical IPV during pregnancy in India. We used linear probability model (LPM) to assess the linear association. To address reverse causality, we employed a two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) model, instrumenting women’s employment with the cluster average female employment status. LPM estimates indicated a modest positive relationship ( β = 0.013, CI 0.007–0.019, p < 0.001), but women’s employment was endogenous. After accounting for endogeneity, our findings revealed that employed women had a higher probability of reporting IPV during pregnancy in India (M.E. = 0.033, CI 0.012–0.053, p < 0.001), supporting the male backlash theory. Affluence (M.E.= -0.011, CI -0.020–0.002, p < 0.05) and higher household decision-making agency (M.E.=-0.024, CI -0.032–0.016, p < 0.001) were among the protective factors. Hence, considering employment as having a non-unidirectional relationship with IPV during pregnancy would improve the predictive power of the factors associated with the reproductive health of women in India.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talukdar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: