Bibliometric analysis identifies trends and key areas in PMOP hormone research, suggesting future investigation paths.
Background: Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is a metabolic bone disease characterized by decreased bone mass and deteriorated bone microstructure. Despite advancements in hormone-related PMOP research, a systematic bibliometric analysis in this domain remains absent. Objective: This study employs bibliometric methods to delineate global trends, key contributors, and research hotspots in PMOP-related hormone studies (2004–2024), providing evidence-based guidance for future investigations. Study design: A comprehensive analysis was conducted using 2004 to 2024 literature systematically retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database, focusing on PMOP-hormone interactions. Methods: CiteSpace (6.3.R1) facilitated multidimensional analyses of countries, institutions, authors, journals, co-cited references, and keywords. Network optimization utilized g -index ( k = 25) node filtering and the PathFinder algorithm for structural refinement. Results: Among 7174 analyzed publications, China and the United States dominated research output (46.94% combined). Leading institutions included the University of California System and Harvard University, with Osteoporosis International as the most active journal. Keyword clustering revealed emerging hotspots: oxidative stress (cluster #0), vitamin D deficiency, and romosozumab, demonstrating the centrality of estrogen receptor-related studies. Conclusion: This pioneering bibliometric study establishes a knowledge mapping framework for PMOP-hormone research, elucidating multidimensional associations between hormonal regulation and bone metabolism. Findings underscore oxidative stress-hormone axis modulation and romosozumab-targeted therapies as critical frontiers, while emphasizing the imperative for enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration to advance therapeutic innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: