Randomized trial explores anthrax infection factors in local residents, suggesting improved meat safety measures are needed.
Background Anthrax is a recurrent zoonosis in Uganda, with 11 outbreaks reported in 2024. On September 17, 2024, the Ministry of Health received reports of two human deaths in Kanungu District, later confirmed as anthrax—the district’s first recorded outbreak. We investigated to determine its scope, risk factors, and recommended control measures. Methods We defined a suspected cutaneous anthrax case as an acute onset of skin lesions (papule, vesicle, or eschar) with ≥2 of itching, reddening, lymphadenopathy, fever, or malaise. Suspected gastrointestinal anthrax was abdominal pain with ≥2 of vomiting, diarrhea, fever, or loss of appetite in a Kanungu resident from June–November 2024. Confirmation required Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) detection of Bacillus anthracis . In a 1:2 unmatched case-control study, we enrolled all cases and controls from neighboring asymptomatic households in the two most affected sub-counties. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for infection. Results We identified 90 cases (86 suspected and 4 confirmed); 80% had cutaneous, 11% gastrointestinal, and 9% both forms. Males were more affected (attack rate [AR]=48/100,000) than females (AR = 15/100,000); case fatality rate was 6.7% (6/90). Overall, 10/27 sub-counties were affected, with Bugongi (AR = 257/100,000) being the most affected. Consuming meat from suddenly dead livestock (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=5.5, 95% CI: 2.7–11), handling carcasses (aOR=8.2, 95% CI: 3.8–18), having a low education level (aOR=6.0, 95% CI: 2.6–14), and being male (aOR=2.3, 95%CI = 1.03-4.9) increased the odds of infection. Notably, 90% of the case-patients purchased the contaminated meat from a single dealer. Conclusion The outbreak was linked to consuming and handling meat from livestock that died suddenly, underscoring gaps in veterinary inspection and carcass management. Strengthening inspections, enforcing carcass disposal, and targeted community education are essential for prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mutesi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: