Randomized trial evaluates phenological responses to climate in Fagus sylvatica across Europe, implying diverse ecological impacts.
Climate change is increasingly altering forest ecosystems worldwide, reshaping species phenology, productivity, and resilience. In this study, we evaluate the phenoclimatic responses of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests across Europe by assessing their phenological responses to climate change across climatic zones and altitudinal gradients using remote-sensing data. We used 24 years of satellite-derived land-surface phenology and climate data to quantify phenological trends at 356 beech-dominant locations from the EUFGIS database, of which 274 remained after land-cover homogeneity and data-quality filtering. To reduce land-cover mixing at the MODIS resolution, we applied a land-cover homogeneity filter based on ESA WorldCover. The analysis was structured across the seven climatic zones in Europe. Phenological responses to climate change were assessed through climate–phenology sensitivity analyses and a composite phenoclimatic departure index integrating climatic trends, phenological shifts, and interannual variability. Phenological sensitivity varied across climatic zones and phenological phases. Temperature-related sensitivity was most evident in spring in several continental zones, whereas precipitation sensitivity was more apparent for growing-season length and autumn timing in some regions. The composite phenoclimatic departure analysis showed that regional profiles were not uniform across the European beech range. Although warming was widespread, precipitation trends, phenological shifts, and interannual variability differed strongly among zones. These findings demonstrate heterogeneous and location-specific phenoclimatic responses across Europe, but the departure index should not be interpreted as a direct measure of ecological vulnerability or risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özmen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: