Scoping review synthesizes prevalence, forms, and consequences of in-law abuse, indicating significant gaps for future research.
Purpose In-law abuse is a pervasive social problem with devastating physical, psychological, health, and social consequences. Despite its adverse effects, this form of violence has not received adequate scholarly attention; consequently, literature on it remains scarce. This scoping review aims to synthesise existing empirical findings on the prevalence, forms and victim-based classification of in-law abuse, drivers, consequences, and geographic coverage of studies on in-law abuse, as well as to identify gaps in the literature to guide future research. Methods A comprehensive search for empirical, peer-reviewed studies was conducted across six databases: ProQuest, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Sabinet. A total of 14 empirical, peer-reviewed studies were included in the review, highlighting the scarcity of research on this topic. Results The findings reveal that while the phenomenon of in-law abuse can be found in India, Afghanistan, Côte d’Ivoire, and Mozambique, most studies are concentrated in South Asia, particularly in India. Evidence indicates that abuse against daughters-in-law is largely driven by socio-cultural and psychological factors, while research on risk factors for abuse against in-laws by daughters-in-law remains limited. Furthermore, although the review identified various types of in-law abuse, such as abuse of daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, and son-in-law, the literature predominantly focuses on abuse perpetrated by mothers-in-law against daughters-in-law. Conclusions The extant evidence base on in-law abuse is geographically concentrated in South Asia. While existing findings highlight the importance of socio-cultural factors, the phenomenon remains underexplored in the Global North, contributing to its relative absence from dominant family violence frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanre Abdul-Rasheed Sulaiman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: