Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study integrates circular economy principles and Industry 5.0 dimensions into the supplier selection problem, introducing the concept of "Circular Supplier 5.0" selection within an analytics-driven supply chain context. A novel multi-criteria decision-making approach is developed by integrating the general best–worst method (GBWM), interval numbers, and a Supermatrix structure. Six main factors (resiliency, human-centricity, economic, circular, social, and Industry 4.0), along with 27 sub-factors, are proposed to evaluate Circular Supplier 5.0 performance in the construction industry. In the proposed framework, interval GBWM is used to determine the independent weights of factors and sub-factors, capture interdependencies among factors, and assess the relative performance of suppliers across sub-factors. A Supermatrix-based structure is then employed to compute the final dependent weights and overall supplier rankings. To demonstrate applicability, six suppliers from a Malaysian construction company are evaluated. The results show that, compared with traditional approaches that overlook Industry 5.0 and circularity considerations, the proposed model highlights the importance of incorporating these dimensions into supplier evaluation. The findings indicate that security, cost, quality, capability, information sharing, and traceability are the most influential sub-factors. Expert validation further supports the robustness of the results and confirms the practical relevance of the proposed framework for real-world supply chain analytics and supplier selection decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saberi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: