Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In dynamic markets, strategic aggressiveness affects firm survival. Reverse mixed-ownership reform helps private firms adjust governance and build advantages. Based on this premise, this study utilises a sample of Chinese A-share non-financial private listed firms from 2007 to 2024 to empirically examine the relationship between reverse mixed-ownership reform and strategic aggressiveness in private enterprises. The results indicate that state-owned capital equity participation significantly reduces the strategic aggressiveness of private firms. Channel tests reveal that the governance effect lowers corporate risk-taking, curbs managerial overconfidence, and decreases the frequency of strategic committee meetings; the resource effect alleviates corporate financing constraints and reduces inefficient investment. Further analysis shows that this impact is moderated by the heterogeneity of state-owned capital, the level of regional private economic development, and industry competition intensity. This study offers new insights for optimising strategic decisions and fresh evidence on how reverse mixed-ownership reform promotes private sector development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: